Re: Is message id TCP12AF a security risk? -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Is message id TCP12AF a security risk?
From: Rob Berendt <robertowenberendt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 12:34:13 -0500
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I'm trying to find how the system initiating the ftp to the other system
knew it was running "OS/400". I tried a STRCMNTRC to see if there was a
glaring entry in there. Like, maybe something like these kind of messages
getting processed
220 Connection will close if idle more than 5 minutes.
but I couldn't see it.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Is message id TCP12AF a security risk? , Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.