RE: DUPMEDBRM on a parallel save -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: RE: DUPMEDBRM on a parallel save
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 17:44:44 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Well, it finished.
It did only use one from drive and one to drive at a time.
The original backup was 4 drives in parallel. It took 5 tapes as the third tape overflowed the lto5. Got down to 4 tapes on the lto7. Would have fit on less but they kept is so that it would work for a parallel restore.
The DUPMEDBRM ran 07:32:26 - 13:25:26. The original parallel save only took 07:17 - 11:49. Parallel is so much better than serial!

Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.