Re: Cipher ratings -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Cipher ratings
From: Jack Woehr <jwoehr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 12:29:54 -0600
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 11:41 AM Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

A product I use for MFT supports a wide listing of ciphers.
I tried using https://ciphersuite.info/ to see what some of them are
rated: Insecure, Weak, Secure, Recommended. It didn't take me long to
figure out that ciphersuite won't even attempt to rate anything beginning
with SSL. Am I to assume these are all "Insecure"?
Is there a different site for such information?

The empirical "gold standard" is to go to this site and enter a URL and see
what it comes up with: SSL Server Test (Powered by Qualys SSL Labs)
<https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/>

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Cipher ratings , Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.