×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of James H. H. Lampert via MIDRANGE-L
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2022 3:42 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: James H. H. Lampert <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Changing from QPWDLVL 0 to 2
We have a customer preparing to switch QPWDLVL from level 1 to level 2.
And I was reviewing the docs for such a change, and Chapter 7 of the
Security Reference said to get a PRTUSRPRF TYPE(*PWDLVL) report.
And it says that there are 11 users (out of hundreds -- the report is 78
pages long!) that have "*YES" for "password for level 0 or 1," but "*NO"
for "password for level 2 or 3."
Why on Earth would a user be incompatible with QPWDLVL 2? If it's in the
manual, I'm failing to notice it.
--
JHHL
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
