RE: Remote code execution exploit found in Log4j

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: RE: Remote code execution exploit found in Log4j - CVE-2021-44228
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2021 13:42:27 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

I owe an apology to IBM.
"If" you have a server defined using WAS the detailed version will show up on the admin screen, for example as 8.5.5.8.
Had to find a lpar which actually had one.
The other lpars were showing V8.5 but those weren't really WAS servers.

Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.

RE: Remote code execution exploit found in Log4j - CVE-2021-44228