RE: Disk 4328-072 vs 4328-074 -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: RE: Disk 4328-072 vs 4328-074
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:36:03 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Roberto,
I did a search for those and a discussion I initiated on this list, and you participated in, from many years back came up. I had both 072 and 074. I was initializing a bunch of drives on a Power 6 that I had done some serious shifting around. That was a long time ago for my shop. Some lean years and that Power 6 was full of all sorts of strange hardware carried over from upgrades. Went straight to P8 from there and now on P9's and one P8 still.
I think I had to initialize and format all those drives.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Disk 4328-072 vs 4328-074 , Roberto José Etcheverry Romero

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.