× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. August 2021

Re[2]: GO SAVE - 21

no - they recommended creating a new outq object as it does control the creation of the spool files
(in fact the members in QSPL). So copying the members would not help.

-h


------ Originalnachricht ------
Von: "Rob Berendt" <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
An: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Gesendet: 19.08.2021 18:29:41
Betreff: RE: GO SAVE - 21

Does each outq get its own files in
WRKOBJPDM LIB(QSPL) OBJ(*ALL) OBJTYPE(*FILE) OBJATR(PF*)
Or are you potentially just reusing the same members?

I suppose you could delete all spool files, run RCLSPLSTG DAYS(*NONE) and start out really fresh. :-)

Because data is not really stored in an *OUTQ object. At least not that I can see by using DMPOBJ or any such thing.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.