Re: Encrypting a library -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Hello John,

Am 02.06.2021 um 23:01 schrieb John Yeung <gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx>:

In the process of writing this, Patrick already responded with more succinct versions. But I'll pretend that "uneven network propagation" has struck again and I haven't seen what he wrote! ;)

I'd not see it like that. :-) I was assuming that my (probably too) terse explanations were enough imaginative stimulation. You corrected that. Thanks! Seriously.

(Seriously, some people always seem to respond the next day to something that already had 15 answers posted within an hour of the original question.

It's very tempting to fire an answer before reading the complete thread, losing overview and invest precious brain CPU cycles where to kick in and provide some comment being actually helpful and not too much redundant. ;-)

If we have demonstrated that the contents of an IBM i object can be
altered from the other side of a share, then we have demonstrated that
the object in question can be encrypted from the other side of the
share.

Amen. :-) That's what I wanted to express. Maybe I've been too succinct? Thanks for expanding my thoughts.

:wq! PoC

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.