Re: browser support of HTTP -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: browser support of HTTP
From: Patrik Schindler <poc@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 10:48:27 +0200
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

Hello James,

Am 01.06.2021 um 23:01 schrieb James H. H. Lampert <jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Which of course begs the question of why one would even be using 10080 as an HTTP port, when it's got such a bad reputation.

My guess is: Not everybody is aware of that bad reputation.

With all these workarounds, not only limited to banned ports, no wonder browsers today are huge, memory-hungry monsters, appearing quick only because the CPUs are compensating the browsers bloatedness.

:wq! PoC

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: browser support of HTTP , James H. H. Lampert

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.