|
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Has anybody here ever heard of a box in which Pool 1 (Machine) is *bigger* than Pool 2 (Base)?
On our E4A, which doesn't have a whole lot of memory, Pool 1 is 411.05M, while Pool 2 is 6130.27M. Makes sense according to what little I know.
On one customer box with (according to "select main_storage_size from qsys2.system_status_info") 49G, Pool 1 is 3173.13M, and Pool 2 is 32884.39M. Again, it makes perfect sense.
But on this other customer box, with (according to the same SQL metric) 16G, Pool 1 is 10208.38G, while Pool 2 is only 2264.83G.
Does anybody have any idea why this would be?
--
JHHL
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.