×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Has anybody here ever heard of a box in which Pool 1 (Machine) is
*bigger* than Pool 2 (Base)?
On our E4A, which doesn't have a whole lot of memory, Pool 1 is 411.05M,
while Pool 2 is 6130.27M. Makes sense according to what little I know.
On one customer box with (according to "select main_storage_size from
qsys2.system_status_info") 49G, Pool 1 is 3173.13M, and Pool 2 is
32884.39M. Again, it makes perfect sense.
But on this other customer box, with (according to the same SQL metric)
16G, Pool 1 is 10208.38G, while Pool 2 is only 2264.83G.
Does anybody have any idea why this would be?
--
JHHL
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
