Re: Strange thing in STRDBG -- MIDRANGE-L

When updating the source member change the increment from 1.00 to .01 or
whatever.

Resequence member . . . . . . . . Y Y=Yes, N=No
Start . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0001.00 0000.01-9999.99
Increment . . . . . . . . . . . 01.00 00.01-99.99

Don

From: "Vernon Hamberg" <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Midrange Systems Technical Discussion"
<midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12/01/2021 04:48 AM
Subject: Re: Strange thing in STRDBG
Sent by: "MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Mark

I agree, to a point. But there's enough in the sequence numbers to
handle 999,999 records, isn't there? I would expect that the largest
sequence number would be 9999.99.

Now does the system do an extra resequencing if the 4-digit number isn't
adequate? Although almost a million records seems impossible to
comprehend, I've seen programs with 20 or 30 thousand.

Interesting situation to have working, needing investigation!

Cheers and good health, man!
Vern

On 1/11/2021 10:52 AM, Mark Waterbury wrote:

If this is true, someone needs to open a PMR to get IBM to "fix"

that!

On Monday, January 11, 2021, 11:13:21 AM EST, Charles Wilt

<charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From experience...Nope...

All our programs are compiled DBGVIEW(*ALL), and even the LIST view

shows

repeating sequence numbers of 9999.00 which confuses the debugger.

Actually, now that I think about it...if I remember correctly...the list
view just ended at 9999.00

Charles

Charles

On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 2:24 PM Niels Liisberg <nli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Just for the books: Does the debugger look OK if you switch debug *LIST

Do you have an older version of the source on top of your librarylist?

On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 8:35 PM Brian Garland via MIDRANGE-L <
midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thank you, Charles. That does seem to be the issue. I edited the

source

and saved it with resequence on and I was able to STRDBG and set the
breakpoint at the line even though the line# is still 11729.

yes, yes there is...

Not really with 9,999+ lines per say, but with source that ends up

with

SRCSEQ values of 9999.00 repeating...

Check to see if that's your issue..

Need to make sure that SRCSEQ is resequenced.

--
Brian J. Garland
Vermont Information Processing, Inc.
brian.garland@xxxxxxxxxx

--
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and

intended

solely for the use of the individual or company to whom they are
addressed.
Do not disclose, distribute, or copy this email to others outside your
company. If you have received this email in error, please notify the
sender
immediately and delete this email from your system.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing

list

To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: