× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Hello Rob,

Am 10.02.2020 um 16:37 schrieb Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>:

Some people are rather adamant about turning off QPFRADJ. The query optimizer will reoptimize a query if your memory size changes. IDK if there's a pad in there to say "if the memory size changes by a certain amount". Reoptimization can add some overhead.

This could make sense if the machine is only running SQL and nearly nothing else. Not a likely scenario, though.

On the other hand, there's always the possibility to change the QPFRADJ interval to the longest time possible: You don't want to shift memory around because (for example!) just one rarely occuring print job coming in generates excess paging in QSPL. The job will be done soon and there's no need to overly adjust, because printing is a minor thing.

Assuming new SQL queries coming in frequently from different jobs and workloads, thereby overwriting old queries in a cache, I don't think reoptimisation is a big issue in a real-world scenario.

:wq! PoC

PGP-Key: DDD3 4ABF 6413 38DE - https://www.pocnet.net/poc-key.asc



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.