Re: AS/400 vs. IBM i -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: AS/400 vs. IBM i
From: Jack Woehr <jwoehr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:41:33 -0600
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.lists.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:37 AM James H. H. Lampert <
jamesl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

And yet it seems like IBM changes the name of its Midrange line more
often than some people change their underwear, and worse, changing it to
something that produces more false positives than genuine hits on Google
(or any other search engine).

*IBM i* was an exceptionally unfortunate choice for the search engine age.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: AS/400 vs. IBM i , Holger Scherer
RE: AS/400 vs. IBM i , Steve Pitcher

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.