RE: PF/LF vs PF38/LF38 -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: RE: PF/LF vs PF38/LF38
From: Rob Berendt <rob@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2019 15:16:33 +0000
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.lists.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@lists.midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@lists.midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

My gut reaction to your initial post was checked. At first I wondered why go to PF and LF but instead why not bypass that and go straight to TABLE and INDEX or VIEW?
Then I just see that you want to change the default on MAXMBRS to *NOMAX...

BTW, "this is an IP shop" just leaves me wondering. I'm sure you don't mean Internet Protocol.

Not that I even know the compile command for PF38 but can't you change the defaults on that too?

Rob Berendt

Follow-Ups:

RE: PF/LF vs PF38/LF38 , Rob Berendt

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.