×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Why, because IBM says so? As long as iNav continues to work and outperforms the "approved" tool, I don't see why people should change. I just compared checking disabled NetServer users. 17s vs 95s.
Although I doubt any of this has anything to do with his bad LPAR performance.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Berendt [mailto:rob@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 12:02 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Hosted LPAR performance
<snip>
old System i Navigator
</snip>
One should be using IBM i Access Client Solutions instead of the deprecated Windows solution.
It has it's own replacement for Navigator. There's a function or two not in there you may have seen in the old one. Some are being left only in the webby version at
http://youribmi:2001
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
