×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.



  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. February 2019

RE: Hosted LPAR performance

Why, because IBM says so? As long as iNav continues to work and outperforms the "approved" tool, I don't see why people should change. I just compared checking disabled NetServer users. 17s vs 95s.

Although I doubt any of this has anything to do with his bad LPAR performance.



-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Berendt [mailto:rob@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 12:02 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Hosted LPAR performance

<snip>
old System i Navigator
</snip>

One should be using IBM i Access Client Solutions instead of the deprecated Windows solution.
It has it's own replacement for Navigator. There's a function or two not in there you may have seen in the old one. Some are being left only in the webby version at http://youribmi:2001


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.