× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Matt, if a file was journaled and then is no longer journaled, the last journal still shows on the object forever. What I do is ignore the journal information when journaled says NO. My guess is you need to do the same. Unless of course you can see that it is journaled and there is a discrepancy between dspobjd and object_statistics.

We first saw this as an issue with files we move over to our test environment and had tons of errors because our vendor software was seeing the old journal name and then trying to start journaling on the file when we don't have those same journals running over in test.

IBM told us it was as designed but the problem is then how does one know that we should or should not journal? The answer, keep a table of what was journaled before you turn it off and only turn it back on for those objects when you want it back on. Not the best answer in my book.

Coy Krill
Core Processing Administrator/Analyst
Washington Trust Bank

-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Matt Olson
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 06:56
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Alternative to QSYS2.OBJECT_STATISTICS to find file journal info
Importance: Low

We have been using the following query to find which files are attached to which journal in our system and recently discovered that it can return incorrect results (showing files attached to journals that no longer exist for instance):

SELECT * FROM TABLE (QSYS2.OBJECT_STATISTICS('libraryname','FILE') ) AS X

Is there another, more reliable way to find all files that are attached to specific journals that can be easily queried ?

Anyone know why QSYS2.OBJECT_STATISTICS might return incorrect information? Perhaps we need to run some routine to "refresh object statistics" or something?

Matt


--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com

This electronic mail message and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited under applicable law. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this message and delete the copy you received


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.