× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Holger is spot on here, there are MANY issues to consider.

Memory amount is easy to see of course but too little is too little.
CPU config can be a biggie. If your partition is set as 0.05 and capped you will be throttled significantly. Even if you are set to 0.05 and UNcapped, if you need more like 0.5 normally then you will be wasting a lot of time queuing rather than executing.

Disk performance however IS #1. As has been mentioned the Hosting partition (VIOS or IBM i) the disks being hosted (Internal disk) or external SAN is Key.

You are looking for the basic disk subsystem performance. (10K vs 15K vs SSD vs Flash) the configuration of that (Too few arms, etc). Looking at competition between servers on the storage. If you have mixed IBM i and other O/Ss on the same storage this is potentially bad and to be avoided.

Then the connectivity could be done wrong. Today SANs are attached with Fiber and while some say you need those 16Gb paths but the truth is if you look at usage for the fiber paths you almost never see any significant usage there even on 8G paths as there should be a minimum of four of these between your Power System and your storage and often there are more. Done wrong this could be a problem but needs to be reviewed.

We can't eliminate the network as a problem because anything CAN be done wrong, however normally we use very little bandwidth so the available network performance usually is not an issue.


Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis

--
www.Frankeni.com
www.iDevCloud.com - Personal Development IBM i timeshare service.
www.iInTheCloud.com - Commercial IBM i Cloud Hosting.

On 2/11/2019 10:50 AM, Holger Scherer wrote:
Hi Bob,

as a hoster which also provides shared machines, we know these questions. Depending on the hoster you are working with,
there is a lot of parameters to check out
- CPU should be faster - yes (you might have 0.1CPU of a Power8
- Network usually is no issue
- what about disk performance? Depending on the disk setup they use, other LPARs might draw too much disk performance

Run a WRKDSKSTS whilst running some programs and check out the last column
which will tell about latency and waits. I assume this might be some issue.

When you did your FTP, can you remember if it was fast or not?

-h

Am 11.02.2019 um 16:41 schrieb Bob Cagle <bcagle@xxxxxxxxxxx>:

Any suggestions of what to look at? It just seems to me that this new machine should be at least somewhat noticeably quicker - but it's not.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.