× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. MIDRANGE-L
  3. December 2018

RE: P7 to P9 test migration/recovery using BRMS - issues/resolutions

Item #3: skipped objects from nightly save not being restored from
previous dedicated save.
I would check WRKOBJBRM for the object in question. Perhaps what it
really needed was some save in between the two. For example ERPLXF/IIM
was saved on Saturday's full system save to V00147 and Monday's daily
V01045 but was skipped on Tuesday's V00002.
BRMS should skip trying to restore ERPLXF/IIM from V00147 and ask for
V01045 instead, UNLESS you tell it to use a date range or some such thing.
Somewhere in the logs should be some message, if so.

ps: Saving object detail makes options like WRKOBJBRM more effective.
This is why we do it. However we do not have onerous retention policies.
Saying "this is our policy" makes me wonder who set that policy and why.
And if they have that same policy on PC backups, etc.

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.