Re: P9 racking/rail questions/issues -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: P9 racking/rail questions/issues
From: Holger Scherer <hs@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 20:46:56 +0100
List-archive: <https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

1) yepp - i also was concerned at the first P9 but - seems it is "progress in IBM design".
-h

Am 06.12.2018 um 20:37 schrieb Steinmetz, Paul <PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx>:

1)The front of the 9009-42A server extends 1/2 to 3/4 inches past any other device in the rack.
It appears to be mounted correctly and is pushed all the way in.
Is this normal for P9 servers

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.