× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



If you need the row_number() in a specific sequence you need to add a ORDER
BY clause to the OVER() clause.
Otherwise the sequence may or may not match the retuning result sequence.
(according to the documentation)
I asked the same question sometimes ago the guys in Rochester.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards

Birgitta Hauser

"Shoot for the moon, even if you miss, you'll land among the stars." (Les
Brown)
"If you think education is expensive, try ignorance." (Derek Bok)
"What is worse than training your staff and losing them? Not training them
and keeping them!"
?Train people well enough so they can leave, treat them well enough so they
don't want to.? (Richard Branson)


-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Patrick
Conner via MIDRANGE-L
Sent: Donnerstag, 29. November 2018 17:49
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Patrick Conner <pwconner@xxxxxxx>
Subject: row_number ignores where clause w/ order by





select row_number() over() as rowNumber, s.*
from qSys2.sysTableStat s
where regExp_like( table_schema, 'CLOCF' );
order by data_size desc;



When I run the statement above to the first semicolon (without 'order
by'), the row_number function works as expected. The first row is numbered
1, second is 2, etc. If I remove the semicolon and run the statement with
the 'order by' clause, the first row is 55, the second is 57, the third is
137, etc. I was curious and commented out the 'where' clause and ran the
statement. The 55th record without the 'where' clause was the first record
in my previous results. So, the row_number ignores the 'where' clause when
the 'order by' clause is used. Is this behavior normal or am I using the
functions wrong?



System is at 7.3 and I'm using ACS Run Scripts.




I listed the issue in IBM Developerworks, too. Try:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/forums/html/topic?id=fd1c41f9-c
f56-4f2e-a633-5337270f43e8&ps=

--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe,
or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link:
https://amazon.midrange.com


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.