× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.






select row_number() over() as rowNumber, s.*
from qSys2.sysTableStat s
where regExp_like( table_schema, 'CLOCF' );
order by data_size desc;



When I run the statement above to the first semicolon (without 'order by'), the row_number function works as expected. The first row is numbered 1, second is 2, etc. If I remove the semicolon and run the statement with the 'order by' clause, the first row is 55, the second is 57, the third is 137, etc. I was curious and commented out the 'where' clause and ran the statement. The 55th record without the 'where' clause was the first record in my previous results. So, the row_number ignores the 'where' clause when the 'order by' clause is used. Is this behavior normal or am I using the functions wrong?



System is at 7.3 and I'm using ACS Run Scripts.




I listed the issue in IBM Developerworks, too. Try: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/forums/html/topic?id=fd1c41f9-cf56-4f2e-a633-5337270f43e8&ps=


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.