×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
But I would never put those indexes or views in the IBM libraries, but my own Custom library. And if I were a selling a package, they would be part of the package library and well documented that there are these X indexes and views over System Tables and they are in my application library - NOT IBM libraries.
Chris Bipes
Director of Information Services
CrossCheck, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
Subject: Re: Do third party products add access paths to system tables often?
IMHO bad practice is:
- providing system tables without needed indexes
- reading tables in "arrival sequence" (whatever this might be meaning) -
its even worse for system tables (or other foreign tables), reuse deleted
records could change, or indexes could be added by the owner of the tables.
adding views and indexes to system tables isn't best practice, but if needed
indexes are not provided by system it might be some kind of self-defense.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.