× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



But he was a "Digital" something or other.......

😉

Brian May
Director
Pre-Sales and Customer Solutions
Profound Logic Software
http://www.profoundlogic.com
937-439-7925 Phone
877-224-7768 Toll Free
  

The IBM i Modernization Experts
www.profoundlogic.com
      

UPCOMING WEBINAR
Make Modern Apps You’ll Love with Profound UI & Profound.js
Learn how to deliver beautiful business applications using RPG and Node.js.
REGISTER NOW ✎


-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Paul Nelson
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 11:14 AM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion' <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Anybody got a copy of level 42 of PTF group 99701?

Here's an update - cancel the request for the level 42 ptf. The client has seen the light and decide to go to level 43.

The former IBM Global Services guy who has been the major roadblock to staying current got canned yesterday.

Paul Nelson
Cell 708-670-6978
Office 409-267-4027
nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rob Berendt
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2018 6:27 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: Anybody got a copy of level 42 of PTF group 99701?

Bryan,
While I think this customer is going about updates in all the wrong ways it would be unethical to put on 43 and remove 43 from WRKPTFGRP.

And what would be the benefit of asking the customer to put on 43 but omit any PTF's which were on it but not on 42? Sure, you can say you're at level 43, but you really aren't. Which in my mind is about as useful as going into the file containing this and just putting a 50 in there and be done with it.

If one had the inclination I might pull a PTF on 43 which was not on 42 which had something scary in the PTF cover letter like "without this PTF database corruption may occur" and show that to management and ask them how staying a level behind, when there's a known preventive fix in the next level, is a good idea?


Rob Berendt
--
IBM Certified System Administrator - IBM i 6.1 Group Dekko Dept 1600 Mail to: 2505 Dekko Drive
Garrett, IN 46738
Ship to: Dock 108
6928N 400E
Kendallville, IN 46755
http://www.dekko.com





From: Bryan Dietz <bdietz400@xxxxxxxxx>
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 03/27/2018 05:38 PM
Subject: Re: Anybody got a copy of level 42 of PTF group 99701?
Sent by: "MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>



why not order the latest, then when applying omit the PTF's that were
added to #43.

Looks to be all PTF's with date added of 07/27/17 unless its on the
CUMe or another group.

GL with that.

or maybe you just install 43 the WRKPTFGRP and delete the line with 43.

Bryan

Paul Nelson wrote on 3/27/2018 10:01 AM:
IBM is at level 43, and my client is afraid to be that current.

Paul Nelson
Cell 708-670-6978
Office 409-267-4027
nelsonp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.