× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



No. It gets ride of the saved code that is kept allowing you to remove the PTF. It's likely that will be a save file but in the library where the PTF was applied. The save files in QGPL that are used to apply PTFs with *SERVICE or DEV(*SAVF) must be cleaned up manually.

- Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis

www.Frankeni.com
www.iDevCloud.com - Personal Development IBM i timeshare service.
www.iInTheCloud.com - Commercial IBM i Cloud Hosting.

On 2/22/2018 10:04 PM, PaulMmn wrote:
Doesn't applying a PTF *PERM get rid of the SAVF automatically?

--Paul E Musselman

.


At 3:55 PM +0000 2/22/18, Steinmetz, Paul wrote:
After perm apply of the PTFs.

DLTPTF PTF(*PRMAPY) LICPGM(*ALL)

3591 PTFs deleted.

3,591 cover letters removed from QGPL/QAPZCOVER
3,964 savf deleted from QGPL.

Paul




-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Oberholtzer
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 5:07 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: V7R1 to V7R3 upgrade prep - perm apply PTFs

Paul:

You need to think about where the PTF is.  The Permanent area is different from the temp area, we all know that.  Applying the PTF permanently requires the system to copy that code into the perm area. If the object is
active it can't do that.   As you discovered most PTFs will it copy, there
are those in the LIC and in OS that are always active and can't be copied.

Jim Oberholtzer
CEO/Chief Technical Architect
Agile Technology Architects

On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Steinmetz, Paul <PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

 I'm preparing for this weekend's final V7R1 to V7R3 upgrade,
 production LPAR I was permanently apply all PTFs.

 APYPTF LICPGM(*ALL) APY(*PERM) DELAYED(*NO)

 There are about 20 SI PTFS, that remained temporarily applied,
 requiring an IPL to perm apply.
 I thought once a PTF was applied, an IPL was no longer needed.

 Any thoughts from the group?

 Message ID . . . . . . :   CPF3994
  Date sent  . . . . . . :   02/21/18      Time sent  . . . . . . :
  16:44:54

  Message . . . . :   Delayed PTF 5770SS1-SI51332 not permanently applied.

  Cause . . . . . :   The requested PTF is a delayed PTF and cannot be
    permanently applied using the DELAYED (*NO) parameter of the Apply PTF
    (APYPTF) command.
  Recovery  . . . :   Delayed PTFs can only be applied when the system is
    initially started (at IPL).

 Thank You
 _____
 Paul Steinmetz
 IBM i Systems Administrator

 Pencor Services, Inc.
 462 Delaware Ave
 Palmerton Pa 18071

 610-826-9117 work
 610-826-9188 fax
 610-349-0913 cell
 610-377-6012 home

 psteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:psteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
 > http://www.pencor.com/

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.