Re: Why not test the lack of change instead of just testing change?

What's incredible is some of the Rube Goldberg crap they rig up to get
around the invalid ciphers. I'm like: "But if that thing fails you'll have
NO IDEA what is wrong and nobody will be able to fix it!!" So they take
that risk but "V7R1 is still supported!"

I leave this up on PCs in their department:

http://ibmiclock.mybluemix.net/


- Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis

www.Frankeni.com
www.iDevCloud.com - Personal Development IBM i timeshare service.
www.iInTheCloud.com - Commercial IBM i Cloud Hosting.

On 2/21/2018 9:23 AM, Bradley Stone wrote:

Agreed, the problem is for years most were trained to not fix if it's not
broken.

I am pestering my customers as well to update... Every week I get a few
more that are on V7R1 and trading with a partner using new Ciphers. I
feel
like a broken record.

"But it worked last week!"


--

This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: http://amzn.to/2dEadiD