× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



GC is what usually spikes CPU for me.  Have you taken a look at GC using WRKJVMJOB?  Might be a clue there...

Pete Helgren
www.petesworkshop.com
GIAC Secure Software Programmer-Java
Twitter - Sys_i_Geek IBM_i_Geek

On 2/7/2018 11:07 AM, James H. H. Lampert wrote:
We have a situation on a customer box.


We have a Tomcat server running in a subsystem with a private memory pool. The customer also has what appears to be "Quick-EDD" running (also in a subsystem) on the box.
WRKACTJOBS shows the JVM job for Tomcat, and one of the Quick-EDD jobs, taking up the most CPU:
Subsystem/Job  User        Type  CPU % Function
  QP0ZSPWT     <redacted>  BCI    36.3  JVM-org.apache
  EDH_J2_S12   <redacted>  BCH    23.6  PGM-PMEDHSNWC


A WRKSYSSTS shows:

 % CPU used . . . . . . . :       79.6
 Elapsed time . . . . . . :   00:16:12
 Jobs in system . . . . . :       2885
 % perm addresses . . . . :       .010
 % temp addresses . . . . :       .175
Auxiliary storage:
  System ASP . . . . . . :     1000 G
  % system ASP used  . . :    62.9912
  Total  . . . . . . . . :     1000 G
  Current unprotect used :    25114 M
  Maximum unprotect  . . :    34812 M
System    Pool    Reserved    Max   -----DB-----  ---Non-DB---
 Pool   Size (M)  Size (M)  Active  Fault  Pages  Fault  Pages
   1     1758.98    909.76   +++++     .0     .0     .1     .1
   2    51952.30    525.02     571     .0    1.7    5.4   12.8
   3     6495.19       .00     798     .1     .6    1.2    6.3
   4      649.51      <.01      13     .0     .0     .0 .0
   5     4096.00      1.59     200     .0     .0    2.6    6.1

WRKSBS show the Quick-EDD job(s) running in a subsystem that's entirely in Pool 2, while Tomcat's subsystem is running in pools 2 and 5, 5 being a private pool, with the routing entry giving priority to the private pool.

As you can see, the private pool is showing some page faults, but are there enough to explain the high CPU usage?

Any insights?

--
JHHL


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.