|
On Jan 15, 2018, at 7:15 AM, Raul Jager <raul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You can emulate a different hardware, in my opinion, if you need some
kind of emulator or "environment" to run your application, then it is
not native.
Native runs over the "hardware" (or firmware?), directly called by the OS.
On 01/12/2018 07:59 PM, John Yeung wrote:
The more crucial question that Nathan asked, which nobody answered,
is: What, if anything, is NOT native?
Take a look again at the title of this thread: Running .Net Natively on IBMi
Nathan's question is: What would it mean for .NET to run *nonnatively* on IBM i?
If that question is nonsensical, then why use the word "natively" at
all? Why would we not simply say "Running .NET on IBM i"?
John Y.
-- Este e-mail fue enviado desde el Mail Server del diario ABC Color --
-- Verificado por Anti-Virus Corporativo Symantec --
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: http://amzn.to/2dEadiD
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.