× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



You could deploy and host your own web applications on an IBM i server,
where your applications might prompt for credentials, but don't use IBM
i-user or group authentication or authorization to IBM i objects.That type
of user wouldn't need a license, nor would IBM i check their authorities.

You could have hundreds of thousands, or millions of user "accounts" in a
database, where none of them would be subject to IBM i user-based licensing.

The IBM i HTTP interface is the only one that I'm aware of that provides
that type of interface. Telnet, database (odbc, jdbc), shell, FTP, and
other types of interfaces require users to authenticate against IBM i.




On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 2:04 PM, Adam Driver (MIT) <
adriver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thanks Nathan,

Yes, I think it does.

Adam Driver | Senior Power Systems Engineer | Meridian IT Inc.
Office: 847-964-2705 | Mobile: 224 250 9049 | F 847-317-8590
adriver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:adriver@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
http://www.onlinemeridian.com<https://209.252.64.117/
exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.onlinemeridian.com/>
Nine Parkway North Suite 500, Deerfield, Illinois 60015



message: 4

date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 13:52:17 -0700

from: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>>

subject: Re: User licensing for web acc SBS



I have reviewed the IBM i licensing documents and believe that I have
enough of an understanding to respond to the question. Whether browser or
any other client, that doesn't matter. What matters is whether a user is
"authenticating against IBM i".



I interpret the phrase "authenticating against IBM i" to mean
authenticating against such things as an IBM i user profile, user
validation list, user LDAP directory entry, etc. via an IBM i user
authentication API.



I don't believe that includes the use of authentication APIs that are NOT
part of IBM i, such as methods that you come up on your own.



If a user is not "authenticating" at all, then they are not considered "a
user", who is subject to user-based licensing fees.



In regard to browsers, any user of the browser-based Navigator for i, or
any other browser user interface that uses IBM i authentication, would be
"a user", subject to license fees.



HTH,



Nathan.



--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: http://amzn.to/2dEadiD


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.