×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
<Nathan>
The commit keyword on the "f" spec forces the service program to run under
commitment control, which may be a factor. I didn't force that in the other
program because reading a file front to back doesn't require commitment
control.
</Nathan>
this design won't work for programms, making updates without commit.
Creating your SRVPGM with named Activationgroup would not run at all with
commitment controll in existing applications. It's the strange design with
RLA, causing most of your problems and your wrapper design with parm Action
has more performance influence than the single call to make an I/O operation
happen. Your "Benchmark" is just telling nothing. Real world programms don't
make I/O to do nothing and even slowing down an I/O operation from one
millisecond to 5 milliseconds would only make a diffrence in processes
making millions of reads (or writes) and then SQL would outperform rla
anyway, if it is used as it should.
D*B
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
