Re: Rename WRKUSRPRF -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Rename WRKUSRPRF
From: James Rich <james@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 16:10:12 -0600 (MDT)
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, B. Dietz wrote:

This makes me think of the users who just want to grant *public *all to files, mostly because they do not want to spend the time to see what the minimum authority is needed. ?it?s just easier? is never the right answer.

This has nothing to do with laziness or an unwilliness to try to solve the problem at the source.

If you really have lost the argument, you should also turn on user auditing and make sure joblogs are created for each session.

Looking into that more deeply now.

James Rich

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.