Re: Idiomatic SQL empty set? -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Idiomatic SQL empty set?
From: John Yeung <gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 18:18:52 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 6:17 PM, John Yeung <gallium.arsenide@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

For now, the SELECT with purposely empty result set is still (sadly)
winning. If there are more succinct ways to express the SELECT, I'm
certainly open to that too.

I mean the empty "inner" SELECT. Not the outer one.

John Y.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Idiomatic SQL empty set? , John Yeung

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.