× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Hi all,

Several security companies and experts recommend to disable SMB V1 in
addition to the security update MS17-010 for windows (which should have
been applied months ago).
For example:
https://success.trendmicro.com/solution/1117665
https://www.symantec.com/connect/articles/petya-ransomware-next-global-threat

I'm investigating on disabling SMB V1 (both server and client component) on
my Windows machines, and how that would affect connections with the IFS /
Netserver on the IBM i.
Regarding disabling SMB V1 and enabling SMB V2 on the i, there is a known
problem with SMB V2 between the i and MS windows: Microsoft Windows
Explorer is ignoring a STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED response that is returned to it
from the IBM i server on a Change Notify request.

see http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=nas8N1021348

Both IBM and Microsoft seem not willing or able to solve this.

Any thougths of the group?

Best regards,
-Arco

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.