×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




By this logic there is no reason to use service programs as any sub-procedure could be converted to a program in a similar manner. I have a service program that handles display file issues, and simple dialogs like this are part of that service program.

Mark Murphy
Atlas Data Systems
mmurphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


-----Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: -----
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 05/16/2017 06:29PM
Subject: Re: Service programs



So... I wish to get out of the 1990s and create a service program named
DropdownBox_PaymentTerms****. What would be a recommended organization for
this? **


After reviewing the code, I don't see a compelling reason to create a
*SRVPGM procedure from it. You could get some marginal benefit from a
procedure that returned the "term".

term = getTerm();

But that would not be much different than:

getTerm(term);

Where getTerm() is a *PGM call based on a prototype defined in the caller.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.