|
From: "midrange" <franz9000@xxxxxxxxx>7
To: "'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'" <midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 09/21/2016 04:00 PM
Subject: ACS versus older i Access for Windows
Sent by: "MIDRANGE-L" <midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
I've been watching the posts of issues encountered with ACS for couple
years.
Sounds great in many respects,
Is it ready to roll out in a large production environment to various Win
and 10 desktop and laptops where our Help Desk can set it up andbasically
forget about it (like i Access) other than occasional service packs?Terminal
We use the telnet session (both display and printer), including Win
Server and Citrix Serversclient.
some file transfers defined,
using i Navigator's AFP Manager to manage overlays and page segments
ODBC configurations on some clients
other i Navigator functions for database like SQL performance and Plan
Cache.
PC mapped drives of Power I, but that should not be affected by the
V7R1 OS (plan to load 7.3 ).
Jim Franz
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.