Re: This is weird: program appears to run faster from a "real" library than from QTEMP

Hi James


No idea about the performance, but you don't need to compile into QTEMP to get a listing - just use the *NOGEN value in the OPTION keyword. The listing will still be created.


HTH

Vern


On 5/27/2016 12:31 PM, James H. H. Lampert wrote:

This is weird.

I've got a program running on a customer box. Earlier, I'd recompiled it into QTEMP, in order to get a compilation listing, so I could determine why it was locking up. I put in a correction, and recompiled it into its usual library.

I then ran what I thought was the corrected version. But because that particular box has QTEMP at the top of the default user library list, I was in fact running the uncorrected version I'd compiled into QTEMP.

After it locked up, I got rid of the QTEMP version, and re-ran the corrected version. It seems to be running at least twice as fast from a "real" library as from QTEMP.

Any idea why that could be?

--
JHHL