|
On 18-May-2016 11:18 -0500, CRPence wrote:
[Some of] What has been offered so far, seems to limit the result
to just one previous main-record. Or perhaps intending to suggest
that one could obtain some maximum\constant number of main-records,
but then apparently a result-set inclusive of main-records from
prior\unrelated attr-records.? I do not recall any that returned
only\all-of the previous main-records for a given attr-record.
This is taking passive writing style to an insane level. What I
think you're saying, is that the solutions so far have not allowed
for more than one main record, or that it might pull a record that
was not the correct main record. My answer to that is that the OP
defined the issue as one main record, and that the attributes always
followed the main record. Since there is no key or tie to the main
record, we have to follow the rules as they were stated, and assume
that the first previous main record found will be the correct one.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.