×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




I never thought of that. Then it's a good idea.Thanks for sharing.

Yours truly,
Glenn Gundermannglenn.gundermann@xxxxxxxxx (416) 317-3144-------- Original message --------From: CRPence <crpbottle@xxxxxxxxx> Date: 2016-02-13 7:27 PM (GMT-05:00) To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Do you freeze your PTFs when preparing to migrate?
On 12-Feb-2016 08:09 -0700, Glenn Gundermann wrote:

We're using a 3rd party to migrate our Power7 to a Power8. We
received an email this morning that says:

Until the end of March can you please defer all PTF’s and cumes
until after we migrate to Power8.


I normally check for HIPER and other PTFs every Friday. It seems
strange to me to have a freeze period for the next 7 weeks. If it
was me, I'd want to make sure I had the latest fixes.

Two questions:
1.  Is there an IBM recommended practice on this?
2.  What strategy are you using?


   I have heard of employing that strategy, as a means to help identify
what is the origin for any changes in operation\performance; the hdw vs
the sfw.

   Holding the software in stasis over a period preceding the hardware
change can give better assurance that changes [for better or for worse]
were due to the change in hardware.  IIRC, that particular transition
comes with a required re-translation, so that hardware change is an
implicit software change, at least for the applications.?


This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.