+1
I don't know if this is a good idea or not, but it seems like a decent
solution. I like it.
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Hiebert, Chris
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 6:03 PM
To: 'midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: Re: Activation Group and RCLACTGRP
Thanks for everyone's suggestions.
I ended up just writing a new RCLACTGRP command this morning.
Here is the source:
http://code.midrange.com/d2db1bea07.html
We've placed it in a library that is above QSYS in our system library list.
The program passes RCLACTGRP commands to QSYS/QWVCCDLA (The CPP for
RCLACTGRP).
When the activation group is specified, the new program passes the input
straight into QSYS/QWVCCDLA.
When *ELIGIBLE is passed, I use the Qwvolagp API to get the job's activation
groups.
Then I process the list returned and ignore a list of named activation
groups.
We couldn't just ignore the RCLACTGRP ELIGIBLE call because the vendor's
product was relying on it to do some cleanup.
This way their call still works for their own activation groups, but our
small list of specific activation groups are safe.
Chris Hiebert
Senior Programmer/Analyst
Disclaimer: Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of the company.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe,
or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.