Re: Any effect of Scheduler cmd ENDJS to running scheduled jobs ?

[Jim Franz <franz9000@xxxxxxxxx>]

thank you Chuck and Paul.
SI48560 was previously applied.
Load and applied SI56344 without issue.
Jim


On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 4:13 PM, Steinmetz, Paul <PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Jim,
>
> I've applied PTF *immed for many years, never had a problem with AJS.
> However, I did have problems with BRMS network jobs,  and HTTP.
>
> Paul
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Jim Franz
> Sent: Friday, October 23, 2015 2:17 PM
> To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
> Subject: Any effect of Scheduler cmd ENDJS to running scheduled jobs ?
>
> To apply ptf *immed need to execute Execute ENDJS DTALIB(*ALL)first.
> SI51856
>
> We will have couple long running jobs running.
> Is this a bad idea to end AJS, install ptf, start AJS with scheduled jobs
> running..?
> Not expecting jobs to crash, but also don't want AJS to freak out..
>
> Jim
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
> list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
> unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a
> moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
>
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.