Re: update field based on substring of numeric field

An effective idiom of an old comp. sci. vernacular that I have failed successfully to abandon, having been learned so long ago; my trying to discard the idiom from my usage, only because society has become so dreadfully keen on reacting harshly to their having taken offense to something, and that as an expression, unfortunately has two words that, by themselves, are so-called /loaded/ words, such that offense being taken is a most likely outcome. Therefore, a suggested edit:

CHANGE/FD&H/complacent/

On 19-Oct-2015 10:28 -0500, darren wrote:

I also had to look it up, but now I'm no longer FD&H, and I regret
doing it.

Vernon Hamberg on 10/19/2015 11:23 AM wrote:

I hope I'm not the only one who had to look up FD&H!

On 10/19/2015 10:05 AM, CRPence wrote:

On 19-Oct-2015 03:13 -0500, satya tiruveedhi wrote:

-snip-

So open defect calls where the DB2 for i SQL fails so horribly;
or just remain FD&H in conviction, /knowing/ that everything else
is so much better, such that there would be no point in improving
what might be denigrated instead, lest those convictions become
compromised.