|
Vern...that is true! I think the aversion is the word "Unix" ;-)
It was my understanding that managing security around NFS services
required a bit more work too...but maybe that's not true.
TGIF
Terry
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Vernon Hamberg
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 12:19 PM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: Re: QNTC and Windows Server 2012
Terry
Windows Services for Unix IS from Microsoft, so they should not averse to it.
HTH
Vern
On 9/25/2015 9:14 AM, Winchester Terry wrote:
Of the two remaining preferences, it's probably easier to use NFS but--
these are "windows" guys and they seem to have an aversion to non-MS
solutions so proposing that they run "services for NFS" is not going
to be my first recommendation.
We have a meeting slated for sometime next week. I am leaning towards
using standard FTP but that means they will have to run FTP services
on each of their file servers.
This will probably be the lessor of two evils in their eyes ;-)
I really wish that IBM support had various versions of SMBCLIENT
available for download based on the level of the O/S. I find it hard
to believe that, with all of their available talent, IBM can't have
an FTP site available with pre-compiled binaries for stuff like this...
Terry
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Richard Schoen
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2015 10:01 AM
To: midrange-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: QNTC and Windows Server 2012
Have them install Windows services for Unix and open up appropriate NFS shares.
Then you simply mount the servers from IBMi.
Regards,
Richard Schoen | Director of Document Management Technologies,
HelpSystems
T: + 1 952-486-6802
RJS Software Systems | A Division of HelpSystems
richard.schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.rjssoftware.com Visit me on:
Twitter | LinkedIn
------------------------------
message: 6
date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 12:55:07 +0000
from: Winchester Terry <terry.winchester@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
subject: QNTC and Windows Server 2012
Is it possible to use QNTC with the new version of Windows Server 2012 (R2)?
We're currently running SMBCLIENT 2.2.8 and it has served us well for years, but the Windows folks are doing some server upgrades to the new 2012 version and our Samba client is no longer working.
Based on a little research, it appears that only Samba versions later
than
3.6 will work with MS Server 2012. Since I am *not* a C-programmer and there doesn't appear to be any binaries available for our platform (at V6R1) it seems that our only options are (1) Use QNTC, (2) Convince the MS-Admins that they need to run the NFS server utilities on each of their servers so that we can mount their drives or (3) Convince the MS-Admins that we must use FTP to push files to each server.
I would prefer to use option (1) but it doesn't seem to work. So I guess we're stuck with options (2) and (3)...
BTW, upgrading to a V7Rx is not likely to happen since we're slated
to move off the platform in the next 18-24 months (to outsourced *NIX
servers running
SAP)
Any thoughts?
Thanks,
Terry
Confidentiality Notice: The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains information that may be confidential, protected by applicable legal privileges, or constitute non-public information. It is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L)
mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To
subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Confidentiality Notice: The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains information that may be confidential, protected by applicable legal privileges, or constitute non-public information. It is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing
list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.
Confidentiality Notice: The preceding e-mail message (including any attachments) contains information that may be confidential, protected by applicable legal privileges, or constitute non-public information. It is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not an intended recipient of this message, please notify the sender by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
