×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




One would hope that cache on RAID cards would help reduce high frequency reads. Further IBM i's single level storage would also help mitigate this. If we read something a lot it will naturally be more likely to already be in main storage.

- Larry "DrFranken" Bolhuis

www.Frankeni.com
www.iDevCloud.com - Personal Development IBM i timeshare service.
www.iInTheCloud.com - Commercial IBM i Cloud Hosting.

On 8/4/2015 12:42 PM, John Yeung wrote:

On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Steinmetz, Paul <PSteinmetz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So writes, updates, deletes will reduce life expectancy.
Reads are fine?

For all intents and purposes, I think reads are fine in real-world
implementations. From the pure physics of it, reading does have a
more-than-zero chance of causing ill effects, but the controller
should be able to compensate:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_memory#Read_disturb

John Y.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.