× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I was going to suggest the same thing (with the added instruction to rerun
the original query back-to-back immediately), but Gerald indicated that he
had built all of the advised indexes. Shouldn't that preclude the need for
the DB engine to build any other temporary indexes?

- Dan

On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Koester, Michael <mkoester@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

I'm no expert on SQL performance issues, but for a WAG I'd suggest that if
you now take the parens away and try your original statement again w/o
them, you might find it acceptably speedy. Thinking that your 30 minute
run sufficiently trained the SQL engine. Which is why you had such amazing
results with the other variants?

Maybe?

Enjoy,
--Michael Koester


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.