RE: Samba

Better just to turn off the firewall. Nothing like a Honey Pot :-)

Here's an interesting one..................

Customer moves to JDE Enterprise One from World.

They now have a distributed environment of IBM i and Windows Servers.

What is it IBM i can't do in this scenario ?

There are costs and tradeoffs for everything we do.

The difference between what we like and don't like is usually based on preference, background and allegiance to our favorite platforms.

That's why there's are least 10+ different choices for application modernization. Yeesh.

Sometimes it would be nice to have a narrow list of choices :-)

Regards,

Richard Schoen | Director of Document Management Technologies, HelpSystems
T: + 1 952-486-6802
RJS Software Systems | A Division of HelpSystems
richard.schoen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.rjssoftware.com

-----------------------------

message: 4
date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 18:26:35 -0600
from: Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: Samba

*I* would question the sanity of running an M$ server for 365 days without
patching the security holes!!! :-)

Nice reply. The norm for achieving up-time under Windows is to distribute
workloads so as to minimize and simplify the workload of each server. Don't
ask any one server to do much.

Of course, there is a cost for that.




Confidentiality Notice: This email, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this email is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this email immediately.