The QINTER subsystem will start up much faster too if there isn't huge amount of unused QPADEV* devices hanging around.
Reply or Forwarded mail from: Kenneth E Graap
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steinmetz, Paul
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 9:05 AM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: RE: What is the highest named virtual QPADEV** device allowed?
We found that we were getting a large number of varied off virtuals over time.
IPL does not vary them back on.
Reason for the nightly delete.
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Oberholtzer
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 12:00 PM
To: 'Midrange Systems Technical Discussion'
Subject: RE: What is the highest named virtual QPADEV** device allowed?
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
