× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I have found that there can be substantial overhead involved in moving dynamic resources, especially memory.
Because of this, I opt to run CAPPED LPARs, cpu and memory allocated.

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: MIDRANGE-L [mailto:midrange-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mitchell, Dana
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2015 10:31 AM
To: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion
Subject: PowerVM overhead

Is there measureable overhead assoiciated with PowerVM hypervisor having to frequently allow an LPAR to exceed its CPU allotment and draw from unused capacity in the shared CPU pool? We have an 8202-E4D with 2 LPARs. One is allocated 0.75 of a core, the other is 0.25 with 2 reserved, the Shared pool contains 3 cores. The larger of the two lpars pretty much runs over .75 of a core throughout prime shift. It has been proposed that we work to allocate CPU closer to the actual usage to reduce as much as possible the situation where the hypervisor has to tap into unused capacity from the reserved amount and/or the other LPAR. Does anyone have any evidence one way or the other on this quandary?

Thanks
Dana


Attention: This electronic document and associated attachments (if any) may contain confidential information of the sender (SHAZAM Network) and is intended solely for use by the addressee(s). Review by unintended individuals is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient: (i) do not read, transmit, copy, disclose, store, or utilize this communication in any manner; (ii) please reply to the sender immediately, state that you received it in error and permanently delete this message and any attachment(s) from your computer and destroy the material in its entirety if in hard copy format. If you are the intended recipient, please use discretion in any email reply to ensure that you do not send confidential information as we cannot secure it through this medium. By responding to us through internet e-mail, you agree to hold SHAZAM, Inc. and all affiliated companies harmless for any unintentional dissemination of information contained in your message. Thank you.
--
This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.