Re: should QSYS2 be in system portion of Library lis -- MIDRANGE-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

:)
very quick response to my Request for Design Change!

On 2/9/2015 5:04 PM, Sue Romano wrote:

developerWorks includes a landing page for the Memorandum To Users (MTU)
supplement. This page has been extended to include a link to the names of
new database files added to QSYS2 via recent DB2 PTF Groups.
www.developerworks.com/ibmi/mtu

We have discussed this naming issue and will try to include an underscore
(_) character in our non-Q system file names in the future. We believe
this should avoid most user application collisions.

Sue Romano
IBM i SQL development

date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:30:58 -0600
from: Gqcy<gmufasa01@xxxxxxxxx>
subject: should QSYS2 be in system portion of Library list?

I ask because because in the latest DB ptf group a file
object called "LIBLIST" was produced.
it is a view over QSYS2.QSQLIBL.

I notice that there are lots of objects that don't
have "Q" names in QSYS2...

we had some apps break because we had a production file
of the same name...

I presume that in the PTF cover letters it would have
told me of this.

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.