Re: should QSYS2 be in system portion of Library lis

[Gqcy <gmufasa01@xxxxxxxxx>]

:)
very quick response to my Request for Design Change!


On 2/9/2015 5:04 PM, Sue Romano wrote:
> developerWorks includes a landing page for the Memorandum To Users (MTU)
> supplement.  This page has been extended to include a link to the names of
> new database files added to QSYS2 via recent DB2 PTF Groups.
> www.developerworks.com/ibmi/mtu
>
> We have discussed this naming issue and will try to include an underscore
> (_) character in our non-Q system file names in the future.  We believe
> this should avoid most user application collisions.
>
> Sue Romano
> IBM i SQL development
>
>
> > date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:30:58 -0600
> > from: Gqcy<gmufasa01@xxxxxxxxx>
> > subject: should QSYS2 be in system portion of Library list?
> >
> > I ask because because in the latest DB ptf group a file
> > object called "LIBLIST" was produced.
> > it is a view over QSYS2.QSQLIBL.
> >
> > I notice that there are lots of objects that don't
> > have "Q" names in QSYS2...
> >
> > we had some apps break because we had a production file
> > of the same name...
> >
> > I presume that in the PTF cover letters it would have
> > told me of this.