Re: should QSYS2 be in system portion of Library list? -- MIDRANGE-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: Re: should QSYS2 be in system portion of Library list?
From: Gqcy <gmufasa01@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:00:45 -0600
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l/>
List-help: <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: Midrange Systems Technical Discussion <midrange-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:midrange-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/midrange-l>, <mailto:midrange-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

we have many apps that
want to save the current jobs library list prior to changing it.
it "was" using the file "LIBLIST" to save the current library list.

On 2/9/2015 10:54 AM, rob@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Yes, they are always coming out with new catalog names.

What was the conflict?

Rob Berendt

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

Re: should QSYS2 be in system portion of Library list? , rob

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.