Re: Virtual SCSI connections, how many is too many?

[Roberto José Etcheverry Romero <yggdrasil.raiker@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

There is a difference between vSCSI connections and virtual DISKS. you can
serve up to 16 disks with one vSCSI connection, there is a long discussion
in the archives regarding disk size and even the possibility of having a
big load source and a lot of smaller drives for the data (that i think is
now moot since they lowered the LS size requirement IIRC).



On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:04 PM, e-mail s44b1443 <s44b1443@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> I have just taken delivery of a POWER8 which I am partitioning…disk storage
> will be achieved via IBM i hosting IBM i. When I designed the system using
> the SPT I configured 8 virtual SCSI connections per partition i.e. 6 for
> disk, 1 for optical and 1 for tape. I read an article on here that stated,
> then emphasised, then re-emphasised the point of having enough virtual disk
> arms…..my question is how many is too many as there must be a disadvantage
> of having too many virtual SCSI connections, possibly memory and physical
> disk utilisation on the hosting partition?
>
>
> Let’s say I wanted to provide a partition 100GB…I could configure this as 5
> x 20GB, 10 x 10GB or 20 x 5GB, which would give the best all-round
>  performance to both the hosting and hosted partition?
>
>
> Thanks
> --
> This is the Midrange Systems Technical Discussion (MIDRANGE-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: MIDRANGE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/midrange-l
> or email: MIDRANGE-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/midrange-l.